🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," commented one MEP supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a future ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous online content suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and fit for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed bills mandating adult authorization for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to follow the Australian lead, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, other nations are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies take a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that states internationally are no longer willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.